Obama’s “Fake but Accurate” Birth Certificate

May 22 2012 Published by under salt

(This is a repost of a post I wrote a year ago, the day Obama released his long-form birth certificate, but given recent events, having another look at the “fake but accurate” birth certificate seemed in order.  I believe Obama was born in Hawaii, but I *also* believe his legal adoption by his mother’s second husband, Lolo Soetoro, in Indonesia, compromised his eligibility to hold office.  We know he was adopted there because his daughter, Obama’s half-sister Maya, the only sibling he’s taken out on the campaign trail, posted on her FB page that Lolo adopted him, thus rendering his birth certificate “fake but accurate.”)

Okay… I was 99% convinced until about an hour ago that the birth certificate was legit.

Gosh, kind of a lot’s happened since then.

How could he put out such a ham-handed fake? This ONE image ALONE blows it and all you had to do was zoom in to see it. Below is a screenshot I took of the original birth certificate pdf downloaded from the White House website. I was viewing it in Adobe Acrobat. All I did was zoom. That’s it.

Look at the pixelation on the last 1!!!!

There’s also the problem of the lack of ‘chromatic fringe’ around the letters. It’s PURE white around the edges of the numbers. That’s NOT what happens in COLOR SCANS and we know this is a color scan because the safety paper is clearly green.

I wish I could say I knew about ‘chromatic fringe’ 2 hours ago but I didn’t. A detailed, mind-blowing examination of the document is here. But before you go, look what happened when I just tried to ‘control-C’ copy the selection above:

 

Barry… Didn’t the Nixon years teach you ANYTHING? It’s not the CRIME. It’s the COVER-UP.

If the ‘mind-blowing’ exam link is broken (as it likely is since I have lately been embed hexed) you can cut and paste this one:

http://t.co/crhhCeP

UPDATE 19 May 2011:

Just figured out why & how the last ’1′ is different from the numbers that precede it.

If you’ve ever used Adobe Photoshop Elements, you know there’s a select tool called the ‘magic wand.’ Basically it selects whatever you ‘touch’ with it, so if you have an irregular area, like the inside of a number (or series of numbers) you lifted off another person’s birth certificate, you can ‘select’ each one then ‘fill’ it with something else, like, black.  That explains why all the numbers except the last ’1′ are so nice and inky black.  They selected areas to ‘fill.’  They probably reasoned that if they ‘selected’ & ‘filled’ all the irregular areas and filled them with black it would give the document consistency.  But what to do about that last number that has to be changed?

They typed it.  Dumb choice.  Rookie mistake. (Did Obama himself do this?) Look at the hard edges around the bottom of that last ’1.’  Now look at the irregular edges of the other numbers.  How do you explain that?  One suggestion is that it was made by one of those rubber stamp things that advances a click every type you stamp something. Uh… No.  It’s too sharp… too COMPUTER GENERATED.  The only thing I can’t figure is why didn’t the genius who did this who presumably can ‘select’ and ‘fill’ just ‘select’ and ‘copy’ one of the other 1′s?  That would have been the thing to do, then just rough up the edges a little to distinguish it from the others.  That ain’t hard. They AT LEAST could have ‘inked in’ the pixels on the typed ’1′ ferkryssakes.  Like I said before, my kids could make a better fake.

One response so far

Irrepressible Orly All Over America

Feb 11 2012 Published by under salt

Below is the latest from “birther queen” Orly Taitz. I hate the term “birther” and I’m not particularly fond of “queen” and I especially don’t like them together, but everyone understands them, so…

This is excerpted from an update she posted on her site (very) early Saturday morning.

God/Gaia/HigherPower/It/Tree Love her. She’s doing a very hard thing, at great personal cost & peril.

 “…So far I filed challenges in NH, HI, GA, IN, LA, MS, (and) there are ongoing cases in CA and DC.

…Other individuals filed challenges in IL, PA, CA, FL, MA, TN, AZ, TX, DC. Similar challenges are expected all over the country.

My main concern … (is) that no judge will remove Obama from the ballot based on Minor v Hapersett only… It will take more, than that. It will take a combination of showing malfeasance, criminal behavior by Obama in conjunction with bringing forward the issue of eligibility based on his father’s foreign citizenship. The judges understand that the citizens will not accept removal of a siting President from the ballot based on the interpretation of the Constitution only, as the reasonable question will be: why was he allowed in the WH in the first place? …Just as it happened in Watergate, evidence of flagrant criminality on part of the sitting President will do him in at the end…”

No responses yet

Motion for Obama Contempt in Georgia

Feb 01 2012 Published by under salt

From The American Thinker:

Obama Got Served

February 1, 2012 | Cindy Simpson

Obama was served a subpoena to appear in a hearing last week in Georgia over his eligibility to appear on the state’s ballot.  Obama’s attorney, Michael Jablonski, immediately filed a motion to quash the subpoena, which was denied by OSAH Judge Michael Malihi.  In his denial, Judge Malihi seemed to leave open the possibility for a quash, if Jablonski had only offered appropriate legal authority in support.  The judge asserted that “Defendant’s motion suggests that no President should be compelled to attend a Court hearing.  This may be correct.  But Defendant has failed to enlighten the Court with any legal authority.”

Instead of respectfully following procedure, however, Jablonski went over the judge’s head and straight to Secretary of State Brian Kemp with a letter, sent the day before the hearings were scheduled, arguing that the entire matter should be dropped as it was “baseless, costly and unproductive[.]”  Jablonski’s letter concluded: “We await your taking the requested action, and as we do so, we will, of course, suspend further participation in these proceedings, including the hearing scheduled for January 26.”

Kemp responded that his office lacked authority under Georgia law to suspend the hearings, and warned Jablonski that “if you and your client choose to suspend your participation in the OSAH proceedings, please understand that you do so at your own peril.”

Jablonski remained true to his word — neither he nor Obama showed up for the January 26 hearing.  I noted last week that Obama was not scheduled to be anywhere near Atlanta on the date of the hearing, although I had wondered if still, perhaps, Georgia might be on his mind.  According to reports in the blogosphere, the president’s schedule on the morning of the 26th was open, and according to an unnamed source, Obama watched the live feed of the hearings.

Perhaps Obama, as well as the several mainstream media news outlets I spotted at the hearing, were merely watching in hopes that the “crazy birthers” would really do something…well, crazy.  Or unlawful.  In fact, though, it was the president himself and his defense team who were the ones defying the rule of law.

The mainstream media, in lockstep with Obama, reported nothing of the events, in a stunning blackout on a truly historic hearing — one that discussed the eligibility of a sitting president to run for a second term.  And more troubling was the fact that the media failed to acknowledge the even more sensational news — that the president and his defense attorney snubbed an official subpoena.

Today, Attorney Van Irion, on behalf of his client, Georgia resident David Welden, filed a “Motion for Finding of Contempt” with Judge Malihi.  Irion asserts that “… Defendant Obama willfully defied this Court’s order to appear and testify[,]” and his “actions represent a direct threat to the entire judicial branch and the separation of powers between the branches of government.”  Irion argued that “[s]uch a declaration cannot go without response from this Court” and moved that the Court refer the “matter to the Superior Court of Fulton County for confirmation that the Defendant violated Administrative Rules of Procedure … and to determine appropriate sanctions.”

Now, will we get the opportunity to debate the meaning of “subpoena” — or whether the law even applies to this president?

h/t American Thinker

No responses yet

Transcript/Evidence in Obama/Georgia Birther Case

Jan 30 2012 Published by under salt

UPDATE II – January 31, 2012: Came across this sort of all-purpose clearinghouse site for all things birther. If you want to drop into the vortex and not work for a couple of hours, knock yourself out.  It’s a good jumping off point to all the big sites on the subject.

 

UPDATE I – January 31, 2012:  The link to the transcript is below, but here’s a link to the evidence submitted to the court in support of the testimony.  I defy you to look at it and believe Obama’s bullish*t nativity story.  It’s pretty damning stuff.

I hate the term “birther” but everybody knows what it means, so I used it.

At bottom is a link to the official court transcript of the hearing last Thursday in Georgia; the very first time evidence supporting doubt about Obama’s fantastic nativity story was presented in open court to be adjudged on its merits.  Don’t believe this bullcr*p that “thousands” of case have come before. Not true.  They got tossed before a scrap of paper was put before a judge. This is the first time evidence was put before a judge, to be adjudged on the merits, not tossed PRIOR to a speck of evidence being seen because of the soft-shoe of fancy-pants lawyering.  Again:  this is the first time evidence has been put before a judge.  It’s remarkable that nobody in the MSM gave it coverage, other than to mock it, late at night, if at all.

Also, again, for the record, I do not subscribe to the theory that the problem with Mr. Obama’s records is that he is not a “natural born citizen” due to the British citizenship of his father, nor that he was born somewhere other than in the United States. I absolutely believe he was born in Hawaii.  It’s AFTER that the problem begins. My own pet theory is that he was adopted in Indonesia, thereby voiding his original cert, so the one he released is “fake but accurate” if you know what I mean – and I think you do!  Links to my previous posts on the matter are here & here & here.

SO!  Here is the link to the transcript.

2 responses so far

Obama’s Bullsh*t Nativity Story

Nov 16 2011 Published by under salt

I am not among those who thinks Obama was not born in America.  I think he was.  I think the evidence overwhelmingly points to it, and that the place of the Messiah’s birth is Hawaii.

I long ago heard the theory that he is (pictured at right) Malcom X’s son, and he damned sure looks more like him than Obama Senior (left), but, whatever.

But, even putting all that aside – just forget who is Daddy is or isn’t – that doesn’t mean that his birth certificate is real.  I believe it is “fake but accurate.”  Even put aside the liberal orthodoxy that he isn’t lying about being constitutionally eligible to hold the Office of President of the United States, because that’s actually a separate matter – I believe he is not eligible.  (I’ve posted previously that his sister Maya, who he has had out on the campaign trail, posted on her FB page last spring that he was adopted in Indonesia, which would compromise his status, and explain a lot.  She was “encouraged,” of course, to walk back that post, but you know how it is.  Once it’s out there, it’s forever. Doing a tag/search of “birth certificate” should bring up my previous posts on this matter.)

There are even very real concerns about his Social Security number.  The one that is publicly available from his last tax return failed E-Verify and there are credible reports that it was issued to someone born in CT in 1899!  And that he has had as many as 18 different Social Security numbers!

But this?  This new birther theory?  Wow.  Adds a whole new wrinkle.  This is a conspiracy theory I haven’t come across before and it’s a doozy.

Yikes.

Enjoy.

No responses yet

Obama’s Secret Service Detail Better Vetted than HE Is.

May 11 2011 Published by under salt

The guys assigned to take a bullet for the President have been better vetted than the President. If you are even casually informed about the long, long list of documents the most transparent president in history has not provided (that every other president has, btw) the only reaction while reading through the list below is bitter snickering.

United States Secret Service: Background Investigation Process 20-32

No responses yet

An Obama Birth Certificate Prediction as Sure as the Sun & the Tides…

May 03 2011 Published by under salt

I know I’m right about this so I want it on the record, publicly verifiable, for all to see, before it’s proven true. I know this as surely as I know the sun will rise in the morning, the tides will change, and that Italian food is God’s proof that he loves us and wants us to be happy.

Okay, the last one was just for fun, but I am as serious as a heart attack here.

Obama was born in HI but he is NOT constitutionally eligible to hold the Office of President of the United States of America.

He was adopted in Indonesia as a boy.  (His sister, Maya, who is one of the few relatives he has he allowed to campaign for him, who presently lives in HI, posted that he was adopted in Indonesia on her FaceBook page last year!)

Therefore, the document the White House released as his birth certificate is ‘fake but accurate’ (Remember that phrase?).

He could say, with plausible deniablity all these years that he “was born in HI” because it is, in fact, true. But all you have to do to figure out why he would fight over 70 court cases and spend $3 million to keep his vital records under seal is think like a young hippie girl in love.

Ann Dunham simply wanted her new family to be ‘one.’ She, like every bride, walked down the aisle thinking ‘this is it.’ When she married Lolo Soetoro and went to Indonesia with young Obama, it was ‘perfect.’ She’d found another black guy to marry, a land to start anew in where nobody knew her, and thus, the opportunity to mother Obama, then his half-sister Maya, who she had with Lolo, as ‘one’ family, ‘forever.’ It’s well known only Indonesian citizens could go to the primary school Obama attended.  This is widely reported in reputable places. But, of course, ‘forever’ fails half the time.

So then all it takes, is to follow this narrative to it’s logical conclusion:

Young hippie-mom ships freshly adopted Obama back to HI from his now home country Indonesia to go to school, quite likely on a foreign scholarship to the expensive prep school in HI he went to. He then goes on to college as a foreign student on scholarship.

By the time he finishes law school, who’s thinking about citizenship? What young man, in the full bloom of his manhood, clutching a Harvard Law Degree, is thinking about whether or not he should straighten out his passport? Please. He’s thinking about getting high and getting laid. Others might think about making money, but that was not Obama’s m.o. Nope. Young Obama never gave it a second thought. And nobody else ever thought to give it a second thought until it got serious.

You can imagine the conversation between Axelrod & Obama in 2008, can’t you?

AXE: ‘I thought you told me you were born in HI?’

OBAMA: ‘I was, but…’

AXE: ‘But WHAT?’

OBAMA:  ’Well, it seems there was an adoption…’

AXE:  ’ADOPTION?’

OBAMA:  ’Uh… Yeah. My mom had my step-dad adopt me in Indonesia when I was, like, 5, which sort made my American birth certificate… Well, it might have been sort of… nullified…’

AXE: ‘You’re not an American citizen?  Are you dual? Cuz dual f*cks it all up just as bad, Barack!’

OBAMA:  ’Uh… I don’t … Well… It’s complicated…’

YA THINK?

Wait and watch. That piece of crap PDF the White House posted was a fake. He was born in HI but that document was a fake.

‘Fake but accurate.’

6 responses so far

Zooming in “1″ Question About the LFBC

Apr 28 2011 Published by under salt

Okay… I was 99% convinced until about an hour ago that the birth certificate was legit.

Gosh, kind of a lot’s happened since then.

How could he put out such a ham-handed fake? This ONE image ALONE blows it and all you had to do was zoom in to see it. Below is a screenshot I took of the original birth certificate pdf downloaded from the White House website. I was viewing it in Adobe Acrobat. All I did was zoom. That’s it.

Look at the pixelation on the last 1!!!!

There’s also the problem of the lack of ‘chromatic fringe’ around the letters. It’s PURE white around the edges of the numbers. That’s NOT what happens in COLOR SCANS and we know this is a color scan because the safety paper is clearly green.

I wish I could say I knew about ‘chromatic fringe’ 2 hours ago but I didn’t. A detailed, mind-blowing examination of the document is here. But before you go, look what happened when I just tried to ‘control-C’ copy the selection above:

 

Barry… Didn’t the Nixon years teach you ANYTHING? It’s not the CRIME. It’s the COVER-UP.

If the ‘mind-blowing’ exam link is broken (as it likely is since I have lately been embed hexed) you can cut and paste this one:

http://t.co/crhhCeP

UPDATE 19 May 2011:

Just figured out why & how the last ’1′ is different from the numbers that precede it.

If you’ve ever used Adobe Photoshop Elements, you know there’s a select tool called the ‘magic wand.’ Basically it selects whatever you ‘touch’ with it, so if you have an irregular area, like the inside of a number (or series of numbers) you lifted off another person’s birth certificate, you can ‘select’ each one then ‘fill’ it with something else, like, black.  That explains why all the numbers except the last ’1′ are so nice and inky black.  They selected areas to ‘fill.’  They probably reasoned that if they ‘selected’ & ‘filled’ all the irregular areas and filled them with black it would give the document consistency.  But what to do about that last number that has to be changed?

They typed it.  Dumb choice.  Rookie mistake. (Did Obama himself do this?) Look at the hard edges around the bottom of that last ’1.’  Now look at the irregular edges of the other numbers.  How do you explain that?  One suggestion is that it was made by one of those rubber stamp things that advances a click every type you stamp something. Uh… No.  It’s too sharp… too COMPUTER GENERATED.  The only thing I can’t figure is why didn’t the genius who did this who presumably can ‘select’ and ‘fill’ just ‘select’ and ‘copy’ one of the other 1′s?  That would have been the thing to do, then just rough up the edges a little to distinguish it from the others.  That ain’t hard. They AT LEAST could have ‘inked in’ the pixels on the typed ’1′ ferkryssakes.  Like I said before, my kids could make a better fake.

No responses yet

“What is it about twin girls born day after Obama?”

Apr 28 2011 Published by under salt

Bam-Bam still has some ‘splainin’ to do…

For the record: I have no doubt whatsoever he was born in Hawaii. I have no doubt Stanley Ann Dunham was his mother. If not for the presence of Frank Marshall Davis in his life, I’d be 100% sure Barack Hussein Obama I was his father, but as it stands I’m only 99% sure of that. What I am unsure of is the veracity of his paper trail. Any of it. All of it. He’s just got too many holes…

Below are birth certificates for twin girls born at the same hospital the day after Obama. Read about the questions they raise, here.


http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=292457

.


No responses yet