THINK About This: Obama Would FAIL Background Check to Be on HIS OWN Secret Service Detail

Nov 05 2011

Noel Sheppard at NewsBusters hits it out of the park, again.  From his story CNN Runs More Stories on Cain ‘Scandal’ in Six Days Than it Did Obama’s Ties to Ayers, Rezko and Wright Combined

‘… Combined (these) ‘scandals’ got roughly four reports a month from CNN.  By comparison, the so-called most trusted name in news has devoted almost 16 stories a day to as yet unproven sexual harassment allegations aimed at Cain.’

So let’s do the math on this, comparing, to borrow a phrase of my man Herman’s, ‘apples to apples’, okay?

4 x per month = 1x per week = 1x per day. (Let’s say.)

16x per day = CNN’s frequency rate on Herman Cain’s non-touching, non-naked, no-pictures, no-threats, no-names, no-specifics, totally anonymous allegations of supposedly doing something wrong in two public places, witnessed by people who won’t say what they supposedly saw even though they are not bound by any legal covenant not to — got it?

So…  CNN’s rate of frequency, for spewing ABSOLUTE BULLCR*P is:

SIXTEEN TIMES - 16x – that of the damning, verifiable, named FELONY SCUM Obama FREELY CHOSE TO ASSOCIATE WITH.

It’s SIXTEEN TIMES more important to spew INNUENDO on a man whose entire life SCREAMS integrity than to send a reporter – like they to did to Wasilla-frickin’-Alaska to investigate a person no longer in public office, where they turned up nothing, btw – to investigate people, who, if a member of the Secret Service had a known association, would disqualify them from their detail protecting the guy who does have these known associations – Got that?

THINK ABOUT THAT:  The guys who are charged with taking a BULLET FOR OBAMA have been BETTER VETTED THAN THE PRESIDENT.  

Secret Service CAN’T HAVE ANY KNOWN ASSOCIATIONS with people or organizations whose stated aim to do violence to the Republic…


Just Google Secret Service background check and navigate to their site, then have a look.  It’s thought-provoking to say the least.

No responses yet