Devil is in the DETAILS

Nov 02 2011

 Sigh…

We STILL have NO DETAILS.

WHAT DID HERMAN DO? Supposedly?

Now we hear from someone who supposedly witnessed the case that was bought off, but, though NOT bought off himself, WON’T SAY EXACTLY WHAT HAPPENED. Only that it happened at a restaurant which he named by name…

So…. What?  Herman had a few and looked at some sweet young thing the wrong way?

We now have a disc jockey in Iowa saying two female staffers allege some kind of inappropriate conduct when he was in the state a year ago… in the hallway of the radio station… But again… NO DETAILS.

We have UNSUBSTANTIATED ALLEGATIONS FLYING ALL OVER THE PLACE BUT NOT A SINGLE PERSON WILL SAY WHAT THE HELL HAPPENED ONLY THAT THE ONE THAT BROUGHT THE LAWSUIT HAPPENED… IN PUBLIC… AT A RESTAURANT….

DETAILS PLEASE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

In summary:

1. ‘Non-sexual’ but yet somehow ‘offensive’ ‘gestures’ got 5 figure settlement BUT NO DETAILS.

2. #1 happened at a restaurant, seen by a witness, but the witness WON’T SAY DETAILS EVEN THOUGH HE’S FREE TO.

3. Some Iowa radio station employees allege improper conduct in a hallway BUT WON’T (Wait for it) GIVE DETAILS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Uh… That ain’t dropping trou and asking ‘Do you wanna kiss it’ or ‘You should put some ice on that’ after giving a woman a fat lip, or ASSAULT IN THE OVAL OFFICE which is what Kathleen Willey alleged, so let’s get those liberal knives back in the block before we go all insane, okay?

No responses yet